Representation review: option 1

Mixed model with 7 councillors from 3 wards, 1 Māori ward councillor and 2 at large councillors. 

Advantages

• Māori and general electors vote for between 3-5 councillors out of 10.
• This continues the mixed model that’s been in place since 2010 and keeps 10 councillors. 
• Provides for geographical coverage of communities with ward-elected members.
• Provides for communities of interest spread across the city.
• Potential for more diversity of ‘at large councillors’ to be elected.
• Allows residents to have a choice of who to approach, ‘at large’ or ward-based councillors.

Disadvantages

• Not all councillors represent the same number of electors.
• Mixture of two systems (wards and at large) could be confusing to voters.
• May not accurately represent current communities of interest.
• Potential for perception that the ward member represents their ward only.
• Possibility of division between councillors regarding perceived elector representation and accountability.
• This arrangement may have contributed to the previous Council’s challenges.